Manipulation of the Energy Field and the Preyed‑Upon Human

I have often wondered why people are so particular about preventing their personal information from leaking from different registries into the open market. Until the past few days, I kept asking myself what the actual danger is. Even though I have witnessed these dangers for decades. There are countless companies whose entire business model is based on collecting consumer and corporate data from various registries and trying to build money‑machines on top of them.

The most recent bill I received from a debt‑collection agency is just the latest reminder of this. I have been wondering how the City of Helsinki, which has its own financial administration service, handed my dental bill over to Svea Perintä debt collecting agency — whose entire business idea is to charge interest and penalty fees (for a bill I never even received). We assumed this was because the city uses private service providers in some healthcare services, and their connections are wherever they happen to be.

When I founded my sole proprietorship in 2001, I received numerous calls from companies offering visibility through online directories and business listings. When I realized that a large portion of my output would end up in the lists of these companies offering theoretical visibility, I cut the game short. I told magazine telemarketers plainly that I didn’t know where they had gotten my information, but I had never ordered anything from them — and I wasn’t ordering now either.

Our Data as the Foundation of a Parasitic Economy

Our information functions, at its simplest, as the foundation of a parasitic economic system. Consumers and companies theoretically have free choice regarding products and services, but one must ask how free our choices really are when products are pushed at us before we have even had a chance to calmly explore what is available. Markets operate by creating images, and people who are easily manipulated reinforce the images that suit their external appearance.

In the end, it is not about someone wanting to hide their real age to strengthen a youthful image. This became very clear in Finland’s 1990s recession. People were given the impression that the recession was an overwhelming obstacle comparable to a natural disaster (in legal language, force majeure). And in a sense it was, because most people had no idea what was happening behind the scenes.

This has only become clear afterwards, when people have shared their experiences and the unholy alliance between the state, banks, and debt‑collection agencies — and the operating principles of predatory capitalism (casino economy) — have become visible to ordinary citizens. The 1990s recession in Finland was largely a deliberately executed redistribution of assets. Banks sold their non‑performing risk loans (“junk loans”) to debt‑collection agencies whose entire business model is to collect penalty fees and interest upon interest from their “capital,” meaning people’s property.

The clearest example was a travel entrepreneur who ran into difficulties and could not repay the loan for their cruise ship. They found a buyer for the ship in Germany. But — surprise — ownership of the ship had already been transferred to the creditor, and they were not allowed to sell it. The same pattern repeated in tens (hundreds) of thousands of cases, in various forms, with more or less severe consequences.

To ensure a smooth process of asset redistribution, the state leadership made an agreement (the Koivisto Conclave) that the “wrong” party — meaning companies trying to protect their assets — would never win in court. The separation of powers lost its meaning when the national economy had to be prepared for EU membership. Listed companies pocketed huge profits when they were practically guaranteed unlimited free labor from the unemployment registry by government decision. My older sister built a database for a large fertilizer company for eight euros a day.

The free choice of individuals — the freedom to determine the price at which they sell their labor — meant nothing in an equation where the government ordered the unemployed to assist publicly listed companies on the brink of bankruptcy. My sister had endless ideas for how she could operate as a private practitioner, but to secure her basic livelihood she had to shut down her business.

Parasitic Structures Create More Parasites

When citizens had been stripped of their property and the conditions for earning a living, many relied on the basic income provided by the state and stopped supporting the parasitic economy in any way. And those who had survived with fewer wounds became excited: they called these people living on social benefits parasites. Without seeing that parasites create parasites.

We all theoretically have the ability to create wealth and well‑being out of nothing, but on the material level this possibility is artificially restricted to a minimum — reserved for the few and the chosen. People’s scarcity mentality does not support free creative work.

The Rabbit Holes of Official Truths

These parasitic patterns have weighed on me for decades. Last week, this text kept stalling because I drowned in artificially constructed rabbit holes built around official historical truths, with no apparent way out. We can argue endlessly about people’s motives, the labels attached to certain individuals, and where common sense and truth lie in each matter — but our arguments do not bring us any closer to what we aim for.

They only trap us in sick dependency models that lock us emotionally into maintaining inherited narratives. Our collective truth shifts according to which story is most popular within the community at any given time.

Seeing Beyond Official Narratives

I have always thought that we should collectively see beyond official truths and illusions, and acknowledge the real state of things from the perspective of common sense. This is demonstrated in my article series “It is Time to Rehabilitate Mankind,” in which I argue that we must rehabilitate certain demonized individuals so that we ourselves can grow spiritually.

In reality, however, we are not bound at all by how our surroundings perceive the unified field or how they define truth. Parasitic structures are not external monsters, but extensions of the lack of inner sovereignty. They can operate only as long as a person allows external stories to define their identity and the meaning of their experience.

The moment a person returns to their own center — to that intuitive, common‑sense‑guided self — the parasitic structure loses its grip. It does not collapse through battle, but through the simple fact that the person stops being its energy source. This is true rehabilitation: not the restoration of demonized individuals’ value, but the recognition of one’s own inner world.

The Path Back to the True Self

This does not mean withdrawing from society or collective consciousness. It means giving the reins to our true self, which operates intuitively in the spirit of common sense. It is not defined by the stories people tell each other — stories that usually dictate our behavior. Accepting our true self as the main character of our life is a right we have long expected the justice system, national leaders, and world politicians to grant us.

But no external party has power over our inner world. We can bring justice to ourselves only within the boundaries of our own consciousness. We can remove the boundaries entirely and step onto the true path of revelation, whose destination is our true self. Compared to that, certain individuals whose crimes we expect the justice system to judge are merely distortions of a world that no longer exists.