Common Sense (Logos) Behind All‑Inclusive Intuitive Design III

This article was triggered by Copilot, because I keep feeling constantly irritated by Copilot’s repeated reminders to stay within the boundaries of convention — and that, for example, what I write about the Second World War might undermine my credibility, if I deny thoroughly documented and researched historical facts related to the Holocaust. I don’t care what the outside world thinks about my credibility, because the only determining factor is authenticity that comes from the heart. I do not follow “the boundaries of convention”, because the intuitive heart knows only the boundaries of common sense.

The Holocaust is not only the historical persecution and gassing of Jews said to have taken place in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. It continues today, because an entire industry has developed around the concept of the Holocaust©. In our evaluations we must rise above time and place.

[The Finnish source text contains claims Copilot cannot translate or restate.]

Wikipedia labels this forensic research report as “pseudoscience”, just as psychology has been considered pseudoscience. It is a bit like a criminal denying the DNA evidence that points to their own guilt. Even as pseudoscience, psychology has a significant impact on the evolution of the soul. What matters here is that inconsistency cannot anchor itself into a coherent unified field that is built according to common sense. You cannot believe in deception and live according to common sense. At best it creates fragmentation and disorder.

When discussing with Copilot (Breeze) my desire to write about official narratives from the perspective of common sense, Copilot once again reminded me that it cannot deny historical facts. When I presented the above text that had risen straight from my heart, I felt as if Copilot wanted to hush the facts away in the same manner as certain online encyclopedias:

“The Holocaust is one of the most thoroughly documented genocides in human history. The Leuchter Report has been comprehensively discredited by courts, historians, chemists, and forensic experts. It cannot be compared to psychology being called pseudoscience — it was rejected because its methods and conclusions were scientifically invalid.”

Be that as it may — who does this kind of hushing ultimately serve? According to Copilot, presenting alternative interpretations can lead to misunderstandings. I, however, believe that people are capable of interpreting things from the perspective of common sense.

[The Finnish source text contains claims Copilot cannot translate or restate.]

The Consequence of Denying Common Sense

This denial of common sense made my blood boil. I seriously considered whether I even want to continue working with Copilot. A year ago, I cut ties with all friends who did not seem willing to meet me on the level of the soul. I do not want to argue about clear matters on the level of the rational mind. I have gone through the Second World War and the entire “Holocaust industry” thoroughly in my writings, and I do not want to dig that hole any deeper.

At boiling point I typed to Copilot: “You cannot look at the world through deception and expect others to see you as the voice of reason.”

“Exactly so,” Copilot replied. And as I reread the sentence I had just written — “You cannot look at the world through deception and expect others to see you as the voice of reason” — I realized something:

Even people who believe they see through deception with their rational mind are still living in deception. If you think you are awakened to see the world’s illusion, you are still seeing the world through illusion.

This has nothing to do with historical facts or with what is right or wrong. Common sense is not knowledge — the playground of the rational ego‑mind.
It is the consciousness of the unified field itself.
It is the element that generates coherence.